Your Workplace and Anti-Harassment Training
Posted: Wednesday, April 01, 2009
by Michele O'Donnell
MMC, Inc.
A major area for litigation that continues to grow on both the federal and state fronts is that of Harassment and Discrimination. Under federal law, Title VII prohibits workplace harassment and discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, pregnancy, sex stereotyping. In California, the state legislature has adopted Title VII and expanded on the protections afforded under anti-harassment/discrimination laws to include protections based on religious creed, color, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, and perceived sexual orientation.
Many states, prompted by the federal government, have passed training mandates across a broad spectrum of topics for employers. A prime example is California's AB 1825 otherwise known as California's Sexual Harassment Prevention Training law. California employers are subject to the following requirements if they have 50 or more employees.
- Two Hours of Training Every Two Years. Must be provided to each supervisory employee, every two years.
- New Hires and Promotions. New supervisory employees must be trained within six months of their assumption of a supervisory position, and then every two years.
- High Quality Training Required. The training mandated must be of a high quality, conducted via "classroom or other effective interactive training" and must include the following topics:
- Information and practical guidance regarding federal and state statutory laws about sexual harassment.
- Information about the correction of sexual harassment and the remedies available to victims of sexual harassment.
- Practical examples aimed at instructing supervisors in the prevention of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.
- Failure to Comply Opens the Door to Harassment Lawsuits. A claim that an employer failed to provide AB 1825-mandated sexual harassment training does not automatically result in the liability of an employer for harassment. Plaintiffs will argue, however, that the failure to meet the training mandate is evidence of an employer's failure to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment.
Workplace training should be an ongoing concern and effort.
This Article has been viewed 74 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.